Summarised Results

The research team has worked on summarising the results gathered from the reviews identified during the resources discovery and from the additional analysis of the Working Papers developed during the project.

Download the summary report for The impact of Science Literacy delivery methods - what works? or view on SlideShare.

Also available for Download is the report on the Outline model Impact Evaluation toolkit or view on SlideShare.

For the 45 identified science literacy delivery methods, gaps in Impact Assessment methodologies, strengths and weaknesses, directions for future research, and challenges were identified, wherever possible.

The table below summarises the results of the analysis. Each file contains mechanisms organised by groups.

We hope that this work will be helpful to guide future research and work on improved and/or new methodologies for Impact Assessment in science literacy.

	Mechanism Group	Gaps in Impact Assessment methodologies ₁	Strengths, Weakness, Costs and Feasibility ₂	Summarised Strengths and Weakness₃	Summarised Strengths, Weaknesses and Gaps in Impact Assessment methodologies₄
1.	Events, meetings, performances	Download	Download	Download	Download
2.	Education and training - including online	Download	Download	Download	Download
3.	Traditional publishing and journalism - print and broadcast	Download	Download	Download	Download
4.	Activities and services	Download	Download	Download	Download
5.	Online interactions	Download	Download	Download	Download
6.	Multiliteracies/Multimodalities		Download
7.	Citizen Science	nya	nya	nya	nya

nya: Not yet available

View the complete list of mechanisms, Working Papers and reviews

1. Gaps in Impact Assessment methodologies: identified through the Working Papers and/or the Published Reviews (2013 -2018) already in existence. Each file contains additional information on possible methodological improvement(s), recommendations, directions for future research and challenges identified, wherever possible.

2. Strengths, Weakness, Costs and Feasibility: identified through the Working Papers and Published Reviews (2013 -2018) already in existence. Each entry corresponds to a Working Paper or a single Review.

3. Summarised Strengths and Weakness: identified through the Working Papers and Published Reviews (2013 -2018) already in existence. Each entry corresponds to a single mechanism.

4. Summarised Strengths, Weaknesses and Gaps in Impact Assessment methodologies: identified through the Working Papers and Published Reviews (2013 -2018) already in existence.

Back to The impact of Science Literacy delivery methods - what works? (2017 -2020)